Can America Really Bring Manufacturing Back? The Reshoring Reality Supply Chain Leaders Need to Know

The Roadblocks to America’s Reshoring Ambitions

The conversation about bringing manufacturing back to America has reached fever pitch. With recent tariff discussions and political pressure mounting, many assume we can simply flip a switch and start producing domestically again. But if you're actually trying to build products in the United States today, you quickly encounter a harsh truth: the infrastructure to support component-level manufacturing has been systematically dismantled over three decades.

This is about understanding what's actually possible when you need specialized rubber molds, precision dies, trained engineers, and the institutional knowledge to run complex manufacturing operations — none of which you can spin up overnight.

If you're a supply chain leader evaluating reshoring options or responding to pressure from leadership about tariffs, here's what you need to know about the real challenges ahead.

The Component Infrastructure Gap Nobody's Talking About

When people discuss bringing manufacturing back to the US, they typically focus on final assembly. Can we build the finished product here? But that's not where the real constraint lives. The bottleneck is several layers deeper in the supply chain at the component and raw material level.

What's Actually Missing:

Consider a manufacturer looking to produce a relatively simple industrial product domestically. Even with the will and capital to build a US factory, they immediately hit walls:

• Specialized tooling and dies that need to be custom-made by craftspeople with decades of experience who largely don't exist in the US anymore

• Niche component suppliers for things like specialized rubber compounds, small metal parts, or precision-molded pieces that require specific machinery
• Engineers with institutional knowledge about how to set up and optimize production lines for these specific processes
• Secondary suppliers who provide materials to the component manufacturers

It's not one missing link. It's an entire ecosystem that's been hollowed out over 30 years as manufacturing moved offshore. According to research from the National Association of Manufacturers, the US lost over 5 million manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2014, taking with it critical skills and supplier networks that supported domestic production.

The Generational Timeline Problem:

Here's what makes this particularly challenging: you can't rebuild this infrastructure quickly. Training skilled toolmakers takes years. Building supplier networks requires sustained demand and investment. Developing the institutional knowledge to efficiently run complex manufacturing operations happens over decades, not months.

Even if a company committed today to building a fully domestic supply chain, they're looking at a multi-generational timeline for certain product categories. For supply chain leaders facing pressure to "just bring it back," this is the reality you need to communicate to stakeholders.

How to Decide What Should (and Shouldn't) Be Made in the US

The reshoring conversation shouldn't be binary — either everything comes back or nothing does. Smart supply chain strategy requires evaluating each product category based on actual feasibility and strategic value.

Products Where US Manufacturing Makes Sense:

Some categories are genuinely viable for domestic production, especially where:

• Component infrastructure still exists (products that never fully left the US)
• Speed to market matters more than cost (fast fashion alternatives, rapid prototyping)
• Security or IP protection is critical (defense applications, proprietary technology)
• Transportation costs are high relative to product value (bulky, low-value items)
• Customization and flexibility are competitive advantages (made-to-order, small batch production)

Products Where US Manufacturing Remains Unrealistic:

Other categories face insurmountable near-term obstacles:

• Complex electronics with hundreds of specialized components (smartphones, advanced medical devices)
• Products requiring rare earth materials not available domestically
• High-volume, low-margin goods where cost structure can't work (basic consumer goods, commodity textiles)
• Items dependent on component suppliers that no longer exist in the US (many industrial products)

The Strategic Question:

Instead of asking "Can we make this in America?" the better question is: "What would it actually take to make this in America, and is that investment justified by the strategic value?"

For many supply chain leaders, the answer will be a hybrid approach — reshoring where it makes strategic sense while maintaining offshore partnerships for products where domestic production simply isn't viable in the foreseeable future.

What Supply Chain Leaders Should Do Now

If you're navigating reshoring pressure, tariff uncertainty, or evaluating domestic manufacturing options, here's how to approach the conversation strategically:

1. Audit Your Component Dependencies

Map your supply chain beyond tier-1 suppliers. Where do critical components come from? What specialized capabilities do those suppliers require? Which of those capabilities exist in the US today?

2. Evaluate Realistic Timelines

For products you're considering reshoring, develop honest timelines that account for building or accessing component-level infrastructure. Factor in the need to train workers, establish supplier relationships, and develop institutional knowledge.

3. Calculate Total Cost of Ownership

Don't just compare labor rates. Factor in tariffs, logistics costs, inventory carrying costs, speed to market, quality control, and the risk of supply chain disruption. Sometimes the math works for domestic production; often it doesn't.

4. Communicate Reality to Leadership

When executives push for reshoring without understanding the constraints, your job is to provide education, not just compliance. Share specific examples of missing infrastructure and the timeline required to rebuild it.

5. Build Optionality Into Your Strategy

Rather than betting entirely on reshoring or staying offshore, develop flexible supply chains that can shift based on policy changes, market conditions, and infrastructure development. The same principles that apply to navigating supply chain uncertainty in manufacturing strategy also apply to building teams that can execute in multiple scenarios.

Organizations recognized for strategic supply chain planning understand that adaptability often matters more than choosing a single approach.

The Bottom Line on Reshoring Reality

Bringing manufacturing back to America is possible for some products, impossible for others, and somewhere in between for most. The difference depends on whether the component-level infrastructure exists or can realistically be rebuilt within your strategic timeframe.

The reshoring conversation needs more nuance. It's not about whether we want to manufacture domestically — many companies do. It's about whether the ecosystem exists to support it, and whether the investment required makes strategic sense for specific product categories.

As supply chain leaders, your role is to cut through the political rhetoric and evaluate reshoring based on operational reality. That means understanding infrastructure gaps, calculating true costs, and building flexible strategies that can adapt as the landscape evolves.

Contact us to learn how we help manufacturing and supply chain organizations find leaders who understand both domestic and global operations.

Want to hear more insights on supply chain hiring trends?

Check out our Procurement Pulse podcast where we explore the latest trends in supply chain recruiting, procurement strategy, and talent development, featuring actionable insights from the leaders driving transformation across global operations.